Skip to content

Posts tagged ‘San Diego real estate broker’

8
Nov

San Diego homes for sale

San Diego homes for sale

In San Diego, California, there is a wide range of homes for sale. There are luxury homes in downtown San Diego for sale in high-rise buildings, there are San Diego homes for sale with ocean views, and there are San Diego homes for sale in the East County that have mountain and city light views.


Read more »

26
Nov

Happy Thanksgiving

 

   

Cool Happy Thanksgiving To All – Have a Safe and Wonderful Holiday. Bye
 
 
 
                                                                                              San Diego real estate broker
6
Oct

San Diego Real Estate Market … What Did You Expect?

San Diego Real Estate MarketSan Diego real estate is very scarce. Most of San Diego open space is owned by the military/Government/parks. So, San Diego real estate can never really go down much in value. If you don't buy a home in San Diego now, the rising prices will never let you purchase as good a value.

Act now! It's 2004 and you can still buy your San Diego home with no down payment, no need to prove employment, the option to pay or not on an irregular basis, below market interest rates for the first few years, monthly mortgage payments low enough that it will cheaper to buy a home than rent an apartment.

Already own a San Diego home?  Why not get a home equity loan 25% more than the home is worth and go on that dream vacation and you can buy a speed boat on your return.

The San Diego media 'financial' commentators were all on board the real estate hype train;after all how could they say anything that would upset their real estate developer advertisers/sponsors?

What did the Government expect would happen with these types of enticements? The newspapers, media 'talking heads' Realtors, banks, appraisers, all fed the fire. Anyone who would even question the San Diego housing market excesses was immediately ridiculed and instantly labeled a 'bubble head' for their lack of 'true vision.'

The truly sad part of this lament is the fact that in late 2005, even after the San Diego month after month real estate sales figures were off double digits, and after most real estate developers were offering huge cash incentives, the main-stream media still did not raise any red flags. Instead it was 'just a return to normal' or “a great time to buy without the pressure of multiple offers." 

So, for those who still blame this all on sub-prime loans, take off your rose-colored glasses and maybe you'll see that the real reasons were much more complex but founded on greed and the herd instinct. If we learn anything from this, it should be that basic economic principals cannot be ignored. When the siren call of a 'new paradigm' is again sounded, heed the lesson of the great 2005 San Diego real estate bubble.

A few prior related posts:

San Diego Home Sales Up … San Diego Home Median Price Drops

Government Bail-Out – Risk & Reward

Southern California Home Prices Drop 34% in August

#1 Key To Purchasing Real Estate in the San Diego Market

The San Diego California Real Estate Great Depression

Yale Professor … House Price Decline Could Be Worse than Great Depression

 

 San Diego real estate agents

 

17
Jul

San Diego Real Estate … The Coming Next Wave of Foreclosures

San Diego real estate foreclosuresThe first wave of foreclosures occurred due to the re-setting of some "sub-prime" loans. These loans were predominantly the 80/20 loans that were used to assist buyers to obtain property with no down payment. Later in the cycle of the origination of these loans, the documentation requirements were lessened considerably, so that by 2005, buyers were able to obtain 80/20 loans to purchase property with little- to no-income documentation. Buyers speculated on properties increasing in value and had little regard for the payments. As the loans re-set (usually 2-3 years later), the buyers found themselves unable to make the payments or unable to refinance, and the properties ended up in foreclosure.

Here's what we need to understand about these loans:

1. Is that they were spread across the United States (demographic and geographic distribution) and

2. There were a lot of them done for buyers buying new homes. In San Diego, we are seeing the results of these loans as properties in newly constructed developments (Eastlake, San Marcos, Condo conversions, etc.) are defaulting in high numbers. However, the buyers of these properties generally DID understand that the loan would convert or "adjust" after an initial 2-3 (in some cases 5) year period. Further research suggests, however, that these buyers were not necessarily defaulting due to rising payments (the Fed has reduced short term rates significantly, thereby reducing the impact of the adjustment) but rather were defaulting to rid themselves of a negative equity position.

Many buyers in San Diego County who purchased properties in the $500k range and borrowed the entire $500k, and now find the property worth a current estimate of $400k are choosing to walk away from the negative equity position, regardless of ability to handle the payments. Research by the Federal Reserve has deemed these "unpreventable" foreclosures in that the property cannot be refinanced and the borrower is not compelled to keep the property with no hope of any short term appreciation.

However, the impact of these resets is nothing compared to the upcoming impact of the "option ARMs" that are going to reset in 2009 – 2011 (peaking in 2010).

 San Diego real estate blog

During the housing heyday, borrowers quit even asking about rate, and asked instead "what are the lowest payments you can get me for this home." Lenders responded by offering the option arms with a 1% (or other similarly low) start rates but with a "real" rate tied to the LIBOR or to US Treasuries or other indexes. The use of these loans peaked in 2005. These loans were predominantly used in Southern California and other high cost housing areas and were used with a much greater frequency than in more "affordable" areas in middle America (not near the geographic diversity as the sub prime loans). Here's where it gets tricky. While folks with the 2/28 loans knew an adjustment was coming, many option arm borrowers are NOT aware that an adjustment is coming. Almost ALL option arms are structured in a similar fashion. They have a feature where they "re-cast" every 5 years. This means that at the end of the initial 5 year period, the initial start rate (often called the "teaser" rate) goes away. The loan will then reset or re-cast and the payments will be based on a full amortizing loan amount for the remaining 25 years of the loan. Many of the people with this type of loan simply do not know or understand that this will happen.

Here's an example. Let's say that a buyer purchased a property in 2005 for $550,000. If they put 10% down, they would have a loan amount of $495,000. With an initial "teaser" rate of 1%, they would have minimum payments for the 1st year of $1592 per month. If the "fully amortized" or "real" payment was based at say, 6.5%, the loan balance would go up by over $1500 per month. So, where would the buyer be at the end of the first year? Assuming that the buyer made only the minimum payment (which most do), the minimum payment can only increase by 7.5% of the PAYMENT AMOUNT. So, the $1592 payment become a $1711 payment. However, the buyer owed an additional $18,000 more than the $495,000 because of the negative amortization. What happens next? 

In the 5th year, the minimum payment will be just over $2100 per month. Assuming that the "real" rate is in the 6.5% range over the initial 5 yrs (which looks pretty realistic based on current rates), the loan balance would have increased to approximately $550,000. What happens now?

This is the interesting part because even many savvy and educated buyers and borrowers simply do not know. What happens is this: The loan at that point "re-casts" and becomes amortized over the remaining 25 years at the current rate. If we continue to use the 6.5% as a reference point, the payment will go from $2100 to over $3700 a month!! Thats right, a $1500 per month increase ($550,000 at 6.5% for $25 yrs yields a pmt of $3713).

Meanwhile, the median value of a home that was worth $550,000 in 2005 might only be $400,000 in 2010 (assuming a decline of 25% in value. Per today's San Diego Union Tribune, the value of the average SD home lost 25% in the last year alone, so the $400k estimated value figure might be generous). Now, imagine how many people with a $400,000 property and a $550,000 loan are going to hang in there after finding out that their payment is going up $1500 per month?

This will be the next wave of foreclosures. These loans and properties are in all areas of San Diego, not just the newly constructed properties on the outskirts of town. The fallout of these foreclosures in San Diego will hit higher end and coastal areas and everywhere in between. YIKES!   Many thanks to our guest author, Mr.Greg Brooks Southwest area manager San Diego Mortgage Network for this enlightening post. *Ed notes: The next bank with possible trouble??… I've been told Downey Savings & Loan was a major player in the option arm business and about a year ago their non-performing loans were at appx. 1.3%. In June 2008, it's said that Downey's non-performing loans are now appx. 15%!                                      San Diego real estate blog

15
Jul

Believe The Real Estate Industry “Experts” … I Don’t Think So!

San Diego California real estate

When you have an economist for any trade group in involved in sales, you're never going to get an accurate forecast. After all, it's not accuracy they strive for, but rather the rose-colored glasses view of it's always a good time to buy real estate. 

This is nothing new. But, what still surprises me is how all the media outlets take these faulted forecasts as gospel. 

[youtube]AHT5UwiYtDc[/youtube] 

San Diego California real estate agent 

14
Mar

Does the National Association of Realtors really need an economist?

San Diego California real estate marketI've been a member of the National Association of Realtors (NAR) for over 30 years and I'm hard-pressed to remember the Association forecast being anything but overly optimistic.I'm also a member of the San Diego Association of Realtors and the California Association of Realtors.   I have nothing against realtor associations but I do have an issue with these associations putting out an economic forecast.  How can any forecast done by an economist who is an employee of a trade association, whose mantra is “It's always a good time to buy real estate," possibly put out an accurate forecast for real estate trends if those trends are anything other than positive.So is the association actually benefiting, or for that matter, providing proper guidance to the general public by issuing continued rosy forecasts. 

Only occasionally are the forecasts sprinkled with a milk-toast opinion of possible market slowing.The real estate-buying public is becoming more sophisticated and is able to access multiple sources of information through the Internet. It's my opinion that the constant overly optimistic outlook of the National Association of Realtors’ chief economist is making the association and all its members look foolish to say the least.

In February of 2005, then NAR chief economist Mr. Lereah published a book with an exceedingly long title.  This book is titled: “Are you missing the real estate boom?  The boom will not bust and why property values will continue to climb through the end of the decade — and how to profit from them.”  Shortly after the publication of this book, many real estate markets including San Diego's, took a decidedly downward trend which has continued through to today.NAR’s December 2005 forecast for 2006 said existing home sales would fall 3.7% and new home sales would fall by 4.8%.  What actually happened, from data released in December 2006, existing home sales fell 8.6%, more than twice the NAR is forecast, and new home sales fell 17.8%, which was almost 4 times more than the predicted forecast.

In December 2006 the chief economist for the NAR said: “Most of the correction in home prices is behind us, but general gains in value next year will be modest by historical standards.” It was stated in this report that existing home sales were expected to be off 1% and new home sales to fall 9.4%.  What actually occurred for 2007 was that existing home sales took a fall of 12.3%, and not the 1% predicted by the NAR.  New home sales were down about 25%, again, off from the original 9.4% decline projected by the National Association of Realtors.

Now for 2008, the NAR is projecting existing home sales will rise very slightly, and the median home price should also rise.  Also projected is that new home sales will continue to fall sharply in the range of about a 12% drop.  The report also speculates that for the largest part of the market, existing home sales, the bottom has come, and 2008 will be a turning point.

Is the NAR's current projection, likely to occur?  With the Fed dropping interest rates hand over fist, I think there is a 50-50 possibility that finally NAR’s forecast may be close to reality.  If the housing market numbers for 2008 come anywhere close to NAR’s projection, will it vindicate the necessity for the association having an economist on staff?  To me it's kind of like a broken clock; it will be correct at least twice during a 24-hour period.

Personally I believe the NAR should leave the forecast up to the government and the Wall Street economists and just report the actual housing numbers.  Let's face it; it's not always a good time to buy real estate.  Let's try to enhance the general public’s perception of Realtors by sticking to the facts, and leaving the projections and forecast to others.   San Diego California Realtors

 

21
Feb

CALIFORNIA NEW HOME SALES DECLINE 30 PERCENT IN 2007

The pace of new-home sales across California fell more than 30 percent in 2007 compared with 2006, according to recent data from the California Building Industry Association (CBIA). Its January report showed sales of single family homes dropped by 29.7 percent, with new home and condominium sales during 2007 totaling 61,861 compared with 89,773 the previous year.  San Diego CA real estate