Skip to content

Posts tagged ‘San Diego foreclosures’

6
Feb

San Diego Home Foreclosure … Is It Really So Bad?

San Diego Home ForeclosuresIn a Wall Street Journal article published on 1-31-09, Ramsel Su (a real-estate consultant and a former REO broker) made some interesting and controversial observations on the current housing market bust.
 
In part, Mr. Su said "If the intent is to help homeowners, then foreclosure is undoubtedly the best solution.  Walking away from the mortgage immediately repairs one's balance sheet." What about all the proposed fixes?  Su writes:
        "Loan modification is not only ineffective, it is evil. Coercing borrowers to continue paying a mortgage on a home that is hopelessly overvalued and not informing them of alternatives is predatory lending.
        The intent of modification programs to date is to create a generation of mortgage slaves. Fortunately, mortgage slaves can free themselves via foreclosure, and the masses are choosing to do so."

Personally, here in San Diego, I've seen a number of media outlets review the typical hard working family forced to move because of their home being foreclosed. These situations are indeed sad and make for interesting human interest stories.

Su's take on this is "The media should interview those who had been foreclosed upon. Do they feel sorry or relieved? Are they rebuilding their credit, not to mention their lives? Do they miss the pressure of having to make payments they cannot afford on a McMansion that belongs to the lender?"   San Diego homes
21
Jan

San Diego Home Sales Up … Prices Drop 30%

San Diego home salesA total of 19,926 new and resale homes sold in Los Angeles, Riverside, San Diego, Ventura, San Bernardino and Orange counties last month. That was up 19.2 percent from 16,720 for November, and up 50.5 percent from 13,240 for December 2007, according to MDA DataQuick.

Regionwide, foreclosure resales accounted for 55.7 percent of December's resales activity, up from 54.7 percent in November, and up from 24.3 percent in December 2007. 

  Sales Volume Median Price
All homes Dec-07 Dec-08 %Chng Dec-07 Dec-08 %Chng
Los Angeles         4,430     5,848     32.0%      $470,000    $320,000   -31.90%
Orange              1,731     2,580     49.0%      $565,000    $397,000   -29.70%
Riverside           2,503     4,435     77.2%      $355,000    $209,000   -41.10%
San Bernardino      1,518     2,862     88.5%      $315,000    $180,000   -42.90%
San Diego           2,468     3,325     34.7%      $430,000    $300,000   -30.20%
Ventura               590       876     48.5%      $525,250    $338,000   -35.60%
SoCal              13,240   19,926     50.5%      $425,000    $278,000   -34.60%

 San Diego real estate agents

20
Jan

San Diego Negative Home Equity

San Diego Home EquitySan Diego real estate mortgage bust. Much has been made of stated income, nina, ninja, etc. loans. The fact remains that the debt to income levels that were accepted during the boom time for people who could document their income exceeded 55%. Sub prime borrowers who could document their income could have DTI levels from 50-55%.

What is not talked about is that Fannie and Freddie loans could get approved with DTI levels as high as 63%. Typically a borrower would need some other strong factor such as high FICO or 6-8 months in reserve. Nevertheless, people are not walking from their homes just because they are upside down. Like most things in life there is rarely one answer, rather a multitude of factors.

Get ready for the next wave of foreclosures, just months away. This new wave of foreclosures will be prime mortgages on upper end homes.                             San Diego real estate agent

27
Oct

San Diego Home Mortgage Lenders … Hardball or Common Sense?

mortgage lendersIt's a shame, but in today's San Diego real estate environment, home lenders have taken on the personification of evil.  It seems we are always hearing about San Diego banks or home mortgage lenders who do not want to work with homeowners in trouble.

Though this may have held some validity a year or two ago, it is just the opposite today. Effective July 1, 2008, a new California law mandates that the lenders try to contact and work with homeowners prior to filing a notice of default. This requirement adds about an additional 30 days before a notice of default can be filed. From the notice of default date, there is a 90 day period at the end of which is a twenty-one day advertising period.  Only after this advertising of the pending foreclosure, can the actual sale or transfer of deed occur.

 So with all this time, why do we still hear ‘evil lender' stories?  Perhaps one reason is that many San Diego homeowners owe more than their homes are worth. They are under the misconception that they can give the deed back to the lender, avoid foreclosure and perhaps receive a less severe credit rating ding. The problem arises when there are junior liens on the property. These junior liens can be anything from an equity line to a personal loan secured by the home.

A lender may not want to take a deed in lieu of foreclosure because taking title in this manner does not extinguish any junior liens.  However, a foreclosure by a senior lien holder essentially wipes out all junior liens.

Also, a borrower cannot simply transfer title to the lender without the lender's permission.  Because some lenders have refused to negotiate and accept the deed in lieu of foreclosure, some creative homeowners have quitclaimed the property to the lender anyway, and have recorded the instrument without the lender's permission.

In 1993, the California legislature passed a statute to protect lenders from involuntary (and invalid) transfers of real property to the lender.  The lender must record a "notice of nonacceptance of a recorded deed" in the county where the real property is located.   Redelivering a grant of the real property back to the original homeowner (e.g., borrower) does not legally retransfer the title.  (Cal. Civ. Code § 1058.5.)

A few previous related posts:

California Home Foreclosure Filings fall 32%

San Diego Real Esate Sales Increase

San Diego Condominium Sales Price Appreciation

#1 Key To Purchasing Real Estate in the San Diego Market

San Diego California Home Sellers Lose Big

The San Diego California Real Estate Great Depression

1.2 Million Homes in Foreclosure

Survey Says Home Values Must Fall Another 14%

A Record Number of Homeowners Avoid Foreclosure in the Second Quarter

Jumbo Financing and the Impact on The San Diego Real Estate Market

san diego residential real estate

 

29
Sep

Emergency Rescue Package – The Devil’s in The Details

Is this a mess or what?

You live in a San Diego new housing development where all homes were sold out in 2004. You and your neighbor paid $750,000 for your identical homes. You have been paying your mortgage on time, but your neighbor is facing foreclosure. As we all know, most San Diego home values are way down from their 2005 highs. So, let's say the homes in this example are now worth $525,000 each. What happens when your neighbor gets his loan modified to $525,000 simply because he can’t afford his house?

Actual clause in the government rescue package:

Sec. 109. Foreclosure Mitigation Efforts

CONSENT TO REASONABLE LOAN MODIFICATION REQUESTS – Upon any request arising under existing investment contracts, the Secretary shall consent, where appropriate, and considering net present value to the tax-payer, to reasonable requests for loss mitigation measures including term extensions, rate reductions, principal write downs, increases in proportion of loans within a trust or other structure allowed to be modified, or removal of other limitation on modifications.

Also, be sure to read these related posts:

Are the Rating Agencies at The Cause of Our Financial Mess?

Housing Bailout – The Real Cause?

The Paulson Plan – Still Wrong

Government Bail-Out – Risk & Reward

Housing Bail-Out … Pass or Depression

New Govt. Financial Dictator

 

San Diego MLS listings

15
Sep

San Diego California Home Sellers Lose Big

San Diego home valuesMDA DataQuick .. Real estate research firm reported about two-thirds of property owners who sold homes in San Diego County this summer lost money. The average loss was $161,000, or 35.5% less than the home had sold for previously.

DataQuick's report also said of the 4,318 homes sold between June 22-Aug. 22… 2,624 or 62.7% were sold at a loss. Many of the sales were foreclosures. Losses on foreclosures running 39% off the previous sale price, compared with a 27% loss for nonforeclosures.  

In some San Diego zip codes, foreclosures amounted to nearly 90% of all sales. Many of the other sales were short sales.              San Diego CA real estate agents

14
Aug

San Diego County Foreclosures up 125% from 2007

San Diego foreclosuresAccording to a report today from RealtyTrac, an Irvine, Calif., company that tracks foreclosures, apprx. 2,200 homes in San Diego county were seized by banks, while an additional 3,000 homes received notices of default, the first step in the foreclosure process. The number of foreclosures are 2 percent lower than June's foreclosures, but, 125 percent above levels a year ago.                San Diego Realtors

23
Jul

San Diego City Attorney Wants City To Be Foreclosure Sanctuary

San Diego home foreclosuresSan Diego City Attorney Michael Aguirre, today, filed a lawsuit against Bank of America Corp and its Countrywide unit to prevent the mortgage lenders from foreclosing on homes in his city, which he wants to make into a "foreclosure sanctuary."

Attorney Aguirre said: "The Countrywide executives who originated these subprime loans were engaged in a massive fraud on homeowners, borrowers and investors, They enriched themselves by over $1 billion."

San Diego little Italy condos

23
Jul

San Diego Home Foreclosures Up 180% In One Year

San Diego real estate marketDataQuick Information Systems of La Jolla reported yesterday home foreclosures were up 18 percent over May and a 180 percent increase over June 2007. New June notices of default dropped just  2% percent from May, but they were still up 93 percent from a year ago.

Foreclosures in the second quarter of 2008 increased 31 percent over the previous quarter and 180 percent over the second quarter of 2007. Notices of default in the second quarter increased 6 percent over the previous quarter and 117 percent over the second quarter of 2007.

For the second quarter, the Nestor zip code of 92154 had the largest increase in foreclosures in San Diego. In the 2nd. quarter of 2007 there were 50 foreclosures in Nestor. For 2008's 2nd. quarter there were 211 foreclosures in Nestor, for an increase of 322%.

San Diego MLS listings

17
Jul

San Diego Real Estate … The Coming Next Wave of Foreclosures

San Diego real estate foreclosuresThe first wave of foreclosures occurred due to the re-setting of some "sub-prime" loans. These loans were predominantly the 80/20 loans that were used to assist buyers to obtain property with no down payment. Later in the cycle of the origination of these loans, the documentation requirements were lessened considerably, so that by 2005, buyers were able to obtain 80/20 loans to purchase property with little- to no-income documentation. Buyers speculated on properties increasing in value and had little regard for the payments. As the loans re-set (usually 2-3 years later), the buyers found themselves unable to make the payments or unable to refinance, and the properties ended up in foreclosure.

Here's what we need to understand about these loans:

1. Is that they were spread across the United States (demographic and geographic distribution) and

2. There were a lot of them done for buyers buying new homes. In San Diego, we are seeing the results of these loans as properties in newly constructed developments (Eastlake, San Marcos, Condo conversions, etc.) are defaulting in high numbers. However, the buyers of these properties generally DID understand that the loan would convert or "adjust" after an initial 2-3 (in some cases 5) year period. Further research suggests, however, that these buyers were not necessarily defaulting due to rising payments (the Fed has reduced short term rates significantly, thereby reducing the impact of the adjustment) but rather were defaulting to rid themselves of a negative equity position.

Many buyers in San Diego County who purchased properties in the $500k range and borrowed the entire $500k, and now find the property worth a current estimate of $400k are choosing to walk away from the negative equity position, regardless of ability to handle the payments. Research by the Federal Reserve has deemed these "unpreventable" foreclosures in that the property cannot be refinanced and the borrower is not compelled to keep the property with no hope of any short term appreciation.

However, the impact of these resets is nothing compared to the upcoming impact of the "option ARMs" that are going to reset in 2009 – 2011 (peaking in 2010).

 San Diego real estate blog

During the housing heyday, borrowers quit even asking about rate, and asked instead "what are the lowest payments you can get me for this home." Lenders responded by offering the option arms with a 1% (or other similarly low) start rates but with a "real" rate tied to the LIBOR or to US Treasuries or other indexes. The use of these loans peaked in 2005. These loans were predominantly used in Southern California and other high cost housing areas and were used with a much greater frequency than in more "affordable" areas in middle America (not near the geographic diversity as the sub prime loans). Here's where it gets tricky. While folks with the 2/28 loans knew an adjustment was coming, many option arm borrowers are NOT aware that an adjustment is coming. Almost ALL option arms are structured in a similar fashion. They have a feature where they "re-cast" every 5 years. This means that at the end of the initial 5 year period, the initial start rate (often called the "teaser" rate) goes away. The loan will then reset or re-cast and the payments will be based on a full amortizing loan amount for the remaining 25 years of the loan. Many of the people with this type of loan simply do not know or understand that this will happen.

Here's an example. Let's say that a buyer purchased a property in 2005 for $550,000. If they put 10% down, they would have a loan amount of $495,000. With an initial "teaser" rate of 1%, they would have minimum payments for the 1st year of $1592 per month. If the "fully amortized" or "real" payment was based at say, 6.5%, the loan balance would go up by over $1500 per month. So, where would the buyer be at the end of the first year? Assuming that the buyer made only the minimum payment (which most do), the minimum payment can only increase by 7.5% of the PAYMENT AMOUNT. So, the $1592 payment become a $1711 payment. However, the buyer owed an additional $18,000 more than the $495,000 because of the negative amortization. What happens next? 

In the 5th year, the minimum payment will be just over $2100 per month. Assuming that the "real" rate is in the 6.5% range over the initial 5 yrs (which looks pretty realistic based on current rates), the loan balance would have increased to approximately $550,000. What happens now?

This is the interesting part because even many savvy and educated buyers and borrowers simply do not know. What happens is this: The loan at that point "re-casts" and becomes amortized over the remaining 25 years at the current rate. If we continue to use the 6.5% as a reference point, the payment will go from $2100 to over $3700 a month!! Thats right, a $1500 per month increase ($550,000 at 6.5% for $25 yrs yields a pmt of $3713).

Meanwhile, the median value of a home that was worth $550,000 in 2005 might only be $400,000 in 2010 (assuming a decline of 25% in value. Per today's San Diego Union Tribune, the value of the average SD home lost 25% in the last year alone, so the $400k estimated value figure might be generous). Now, imagine how many people with a $400,000 property and a $550,000 loan are going to hang in there after finding out that their payment is going up $1500 per month?

This will be the next wave of foreclosures. These loans and properties are in all areas of San Diego, not just the newly constructed properties on the outskirts of town. The fallout of these foreclosures in San Diego will hit higher end and coastal areas and everywhere in between. YIKES!   Many thanks to our guest author, Mr.Greg Brooks Southwest area manager San Diego Mortgage Network for this enlightening post. *Ed notes: The next bank with possible trouble??… I've been told Downey Savings & Loan was a major player in the option arm business and about a year ago their non-performing loans were at appx. 1.3%. In June 2008, it's said that Downey's non-performing loans are now appx. 15%!                                      San Diego real estate blog